Cao Junping Yuanzhou and commercial buildings to sign the lease contract, commercial buildings deliberately tried to cover up the shop has been the fact that mortgage, leading to the court in the enforcement, will the Cao Junping more than 8000 pairs of high-end shoes away. Cao Junping court and custodial fees as a result of a 4-year delay will not get shoes, shoes are the end-of-life.

Commercial Building commitment

Speakers: Kaleidoscope in a little red

I think that should be deliberately concealed, Cao Junping to the loss of commercial buildings to bear. Just imagine, if the commercial buildings do not hide the fact that shops have been secured, Cao Junping it will be impossible to sign the contract, it was not those things, nor will it cause a huge loss.

Cao Junping themselves

Speakers: Hu

As can be seen from the report, the court posted in advance of the relocation notice, Cao Junping to ignore the court’s notice did not intentionally move, the court was ultimately forced the relocation of the 8000 pairs of shoes. And then pull his shoes, the court let him pay custodial fees, he did not want to pay, but dragged on for 4 years and eventually led to the end-of-life shoes. I think the court has done nothing wrong and is against the law Cao Junping own, so the loss should be borne Cao Junping.

Are wrong

Speakers: Hai Zi

Commercial buildings to hide in the first place, should bear the responsibility. Cao Junping do not want to assume custodial fees in a timely manner without shoes away and eventually led to the end-of-life shoes, but also wrong. So I think 8000 pairs of shoes by the loss of business, and Caojun Ping building up a bear.

Courts may also be wrong

Speakers: to the east

Cao Junping court to allow more than 10,000 yuan out of storage, there is no legal basis? If so, the court can not be held responsible; If not, the court must be held accountable.